Skip to content
OUR ISSUES

What We're Fighting For

Three Issues at the center of Spokane's future - and of every business's ability to thrive here.

Homelessness & Behavioral Health

Homelessness remains one of the most visible and complex challenges facing Spokane.

Public

Safety

Residents consistently rank crime and safety concerns among the top issues in the region, especially downtown.

Downtown Economic Vitality

A vibrant downtown drives jobs, investment, business growth, and economic strength across Spokane.

WE ASKED

Where Would You Spend Spokane's Next Dollar?

If Spokane had one additional dollar to invest in the community, where should it go first?

Screenshot 2026-08-03 185615

Survey respondents sent a clear message about Spokane’s priorities: public safety should come first. Sixty percent said they would invest the community’s next dollar in public safety, far outpacing streets and infrastructure, public transportation, and parks, libraries, and community services. The results reflect a strong belief that safety is the foundation of a healthy community, supporting thriving businesses, welcoming neighborhoods, accessible public spaces, and confidence in Spokane’s future.

Can Spokane afford STA's Proposition August 4th?

ChatGPT Image Jul 28, 2026, 02_29_09 PM
ChatGPT Image Jul 28, 2026, 02_32_35 PM
ChatGPT Image Jul 28, 2026, 02_34_20 PM

STA's campaign mailer this week claims to bust "myths."

I was the City of Spokane's CFO for 17 years. I checked every claim against STA's own Washington State audited financial statements.

Conclusion: STA isn't myth-busting — it's myth-making.


STA Claim #1: A "No" vote forces service cuts.
-- Myth

This tax has never paid for current service — because STA never spent it.

From 2017 to 2024, the "temporary" tax collected $169 million, and STA's reserves grew $234 million — from $40 million to $274 million. They banked $65 million MORE than the entire tax brought in, while beating their own budget nine years straight, by a combined $320 million. You cannot cut service with a tax that has funded nothing but a savings account.

A "No" vote touches expansion plans — not one existing route.


STA Claim #2: "Every dollar in the bank is committed."
– Myth

They said exactly this in 2016 — about the projects. Then they built the projects without spending a dime of the tax and banked all of it. In 2016, STA managed just fine — projects and grants included — on $40 million in reserves. Nobody at STA can explain why the $274 million they're sitting on today is suddenly not enough.


STA Claim #3: "Ridership increases every year."
-- Myth

STA carried 10.9 million rides in 2016 — and 10.9 million last year. Zero growth in a decade, while staffing grew 56% and rides per resident fell 19%.

Let me be clear: this is not an anti-STA campaign. It's about priorities. Spokane has a health and safety crisis taking lives nearly every day, and a 30%-plus vacancy rate downtown. Lives and jobs — and we're talking about spending $1 billion for expanding bus service? It's like coming home to find your house on fire and going grocery shopping instead of calling 911. When you get back, you may not have a house.

I have friends who insist we should fund them all – a billion for transit and billions more for other priorities. I wish the world worked like that, but it doesn’t. Spokane does not have many billions for everything we would like to do. Instead we prioritize and make tough choices.

Remember: current STA services continue either way - their own audits make that clear. On August 4, put the fire out first.

 

Warmly,

Gavin

Spokane Is About to Make Housing Even Harder -

and Hand Idaho Another Win

Spokane should be removing barriers to housing, not adding new ones

A new Spokane City Hall proposal would require rental housing in Spokane to add cooling equipment to keep bedrooms at or below 80 degrees.

This proposed regulation is clearly well intentioned. But the old saying about getting something for nothing applies here: when the City Council makes it more expensive to build housing, the obvious result is higher rents and less new housing construction in Spokane. And that means fewer affordable homes for working families, seniors, and young people trying to get established.

This is exactly the wrong direction for Spokane. Post Falls, Coeur d’Alene, and the rest of Kootenai County have been building housing at nearly twice the rate of Spokane County over the last decade, and this proposed regulation will push even more families across the border into Idaho.

Just as important, Spokane appears to be moving beyond what many peer cities have adopted. Cities such as Boise, Seattle, and San José appear to have focused more on general tenant protections rather than the rigid mandate Spokane is considering.

Also consider that unlike much hotter areas like Phoenix and Las Vegas, Spokane has cool nights, and for generations, people here have cooled homes and apartments by opening windows at night and closing them during the day. So, the real question is whether this mandate makes sense here in Spokane, at this cost and at this moment?

Worse still, this proposal risks hurting the very people it claims to help. Tenants will help pay for these new costs whether they use the cooling or not - and many of those same households will struggle to afford the electric bill anyway!

This proposal should be stopped before it pushes even more Spokane jobs and residents into Idaho.

What Happens in Olympia Matters

For business leaders and community advocates especially, staying up to date means having a voice before decisions are finalized. Legislative proposals can move quickly, and once they become law, their impact can last for years. Tracking the process allows individuals and organizations to engage early—sharing insights, raising concerns, and helping shape policy in ways that support economic stability and community well-being.